Open Access
How to translate text using browser tools
1 March 2007 A CHARACTER DEMONSTRATING THE OCCURRENCE OF MATING IN MALE CACTOBLASTIS CACTORUM (LEPIDOPTERA: PYRALIDAE)
Orville G. Marti, James E. Carpenter
Author Affiliations +

The arrival of the cactus moth, Cactoblastis cactorum (Berg), in the southeastern United States in 1989 (Mahr 2001), and its steady progress westward to the Opuntia-growing regions of Mexico and the southwestern United States have resulted in research on the development of control measures to halt or slow the movement of the insect. The most promising control measure against C. cactorum is the sterile insect technique (SIT), in which large numbers of male moths are exposed to a sub-sterilizing dosage of ionizing radiation and then released in or in front of the leading edge of the geographic range of the pest. Irradiated males then find wild females, mate with them, and produce progeny which are delayed in development from oviposition to eclosion, fewer in number than in a normal mating, and sterile (Carpenter et al. 2001).

Irradiated male C. cactorum released in the SIT program are marked with colored dye to allow their identification as released males upon recapture in pheromone traps (Hight et al. 2005). In order to compare mating success of wild and irradiated males, an anatomic characteristic that indicated the mating status of males was sought.

A number of published reports mention that differences in color of secretions in the ductus ejaculatorius simplex in various Lepidoptera species allow determination of mating status of males. Proshold (1991) found that the simplex in unmated males of a noctuid, Heliothis virescens, the tobacco budworm, varied from light yellow to dark brown. The simplex in mated males was clear, cloudy, or white. In Spodoptera frugiperda, the fall armyworm, also a noctuid, Snow & Carlysle (1967) reported that the color of the primary simplex (Callahan 1958) was light brown to black in unmated males and transparent to yellow in mated males. Furthermore, they reported that a dark spermatophore is transferred to the female at the first mating and that subsequent spermatophores are lighter in color. These authors also reported that mated males held for several days and prevented from mating regenerated only a yellow or light brown color in the simplex, and that this color was never as intense as the brown to black color indicative of unmated males. Similar results were reported by Haines (1981) for the noctuid, Spodoptera littoralis, by Henneberry & Clayton (1984) for the noctuid H. virescens, and by Bergh & Seabrook (1986) for the tortricid, Choristoneura fumiferana. These latter authors also summarized results from the above 4 species. Except in H. virescens, the color of the simplex was regenerated within several days after mating.

Callahan & Cascio (1963) described the male reproductive system of the noctuid, Heliothis zea, and reported that the simplex consisted of a posterior or cuticular portion, and an anterior or primary portion. They identified two secretory areas of the primary simplex and found that the posterior, or first secretory area, of the primary simplex was variously colored in different noctuid species and, because of the easily traceable color, was the first secretion to enter the female bursa during mating. Outram (1971) stated that the bulla seminalis of the female contained a fluid similar in color to the secretion of the primary simplex in C. fumiferana, the spruce budworm, but that the function of the fluid is not known. Outram (1970) also described and illustrated the male reproductive system of C. fumiferana and reported that 7 regions, distinguishable on the basis of differences in secretions and constrictions in the duct, could be identified in the primary simplex of this species. However, Callahan & Chapin (1960) found little morphological variation in the primary simplex in several different noctuid species, but were able to use characteristics of the cuticular simplex to separate individual moths by generic groups.

Newly emerged adults of C. cactorum obtained from the colony in the insect rearing facility at USDA, CPMRU, Tifton, GA, were paired in individual containers and allowed to mate. At various times (1-7 d) after pairing, the moths were dissected in saline in a petri dish. Females were examined for the presence of a spermatophore in the bursa copulatrix. For males, the thorax was held with a pair of forceps and the simplex was pulled out by grasping the abdomen anterior to the claspers with a second pair of forceps and pulling until most of the length of the simplex was exposed. This procedure frees the simplex for examination without the presence of adhering fat body and tracheal tubules. The forceps can then be used to dissect the remaining portions of the male reproductive system. The posterior portion of the primary simplex was measured, the color was noted as “clear and pale” or “opaque and yellow”, and the contents were examined with Differential Interference Contrast illumination on a Nikon Optiphot compound microscope at 400×.

The mating status of the males, based on the presence or absence of a spermatophore in the female with which they had been paired, was compared with the color characteristics of the posterior primary simplex and with the presence or absence of numerous hyaline granules that had also been observed in the posterior simplex. The granules were 3-5 μm by 5-10 μm. Most granules, particularly the larger ones, were prolate spheroids resembling small footballs, although many were irregular in shape. The granules were highly reflective and were not responsible for the yellow color observed in the posterior simplex of the unmated males. Several authors who described color differences in the simplex also commented on the presence of globules in the simplex without mentioning whether granules were also present (Snow & Carlysle 1967; Haines 1981; Callahan & Cascio 1963). Musgrave (1937) mentioned the presence of ovoid, hyaline, granules in the accessory glands and large angular lumps in the simplex of Ephestia kuhniella (Pyralidae), but did not state how these were related.

Complete information on the mating status, character of the posterior primary simplex and presence or absence of granules was obtained in 71 (n = 25 once-mated, n = 46 unmated) males from 80 pairs. Comparison of mating status of the males with the character of the posterior simplex showed that all 46 unmated males had a yellow, opaque simplex and none had a clear, pale simplex (Fig. 1). In contrast, 24 of 25 mated males had a clear, pale simplex and 1 had an opaque, yellow simplex. The difference was significant (χ2 = 66.71, df = 1, P = 0.00001).

In comparing mating status of the males with the presence or absence of granules in the posterior primary simplex, granules were present in 44 of 46 unmated males and were absent in 2 of 46 unmated males (Fig. 2). In contrast, granules were absent in all 25 mated males. The difference was significant (×2 = 62.88, df = 1, P = 0.00001). Although a faint yellow color may be regenerated after mating, no granules were found in males that were examined up to 96 h after mating.

In comparing the character of the posterior primary simplex with the presence or absence of granules, granules were absent from the posterior primary simplex of all 24 males with a clear, pale posterior primary simplex. In contrast, granules were present in 44 of 47 males with an opaque, yellow posterior simplex and absent from 3 of 47 males with a clear, pale posterior primary simplex. The difference was significant (χ2 = 59.08, df = 1, P=0.00001).

The posterior primary simplex of 64 of the above 71 males was measured to determine whether there was a difference in length in mated versus unmated males. In mated (n = 24) males, the posterior primary simplex was 2.94 ± 0.74 mm in length (mean ± SE). In unmated males (n = 40), the posterior primary simplex was 3.46 ± 0.63 mm in length. These means were significantly different (t = -3.004, df = 63, P = 0.004).

An additional 86 unmated male C. cactorum which emerged from cocoons collected in the wild on Little Dauphin Island, AL, in Sep, 2006, were dissected and the simplex was examined for color and granules. The simplex was yellow in 85 of these males and granules were present in 83 (χ2 = 0.01, df = 1, P = 0.91), showing that the yellow color and the presence of granules were closely associated in unmated male C. cactorum.

The presence of an opaque yellow color and small granules in the posterior primary simplex of adult male C. cactorum are reliable indicators that the male has not mated. Conversely, the clear pale posterior primary simplex and the absence of granules is a reliable indicator that the male has mated.

Summary

The reproductive system of adult male Cactoblastis cactorum, the cactus moth, was examined to determine whether the mating status of males could be ascertained. In unmated males, the posterior portion of the primary ductus ejaculatorius simplex is opaque yellow in color and contains many small football-shaped hyaline granules 3-5 × 5-10 μm in size. In mated males, the posterior simplex is clear and contains no granules. The presence or absence of these characters was found to be highly reliable and should be of value in determining mating status in marked-recaptured males of this species in a sterile insect release program directed against Cactoblastis.

Mention of a product does not constitute an endorsement of its use by USDA.

References Cited

1.

J. C. Bergh and W. D. Seabrook . 1986. The mating status of spruce budworm males, Choristoneura fumiferana (Clem.) (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae), caught in pheromone-baited traps. J. Entomol. Sci 21:254–262. Google Scholar

2.

P. S. Callahan 1958. Serial morphology as a technique for determination of reproductive patterns in the corn earworm, Heliothis zea (Boddie). Ann. Entomol. Soc. America 51:413–428. Google Scholar

3.

P. S. Callahan and T. Cascio . 1963. Histology of the reproductive tracts and transmission of sperm in the corn earworm, Heliothis zea. Ann. Entomol. Soc. America 56:535–556. Google Scholar

4.

P. S. Callahan and J. B. Chapin . 1960. Morphology of the reproductive systems and mating in two representative members of the family Noctuidae, Pseudaletia unipuncta and Peridroma margaritosa, with comparison to Heliothis zea. Ann. Entomol. Soc. America 53:763–782. Google Scholar

5.

J. E. Carpenter, S. Bloem, and K. A. Bloem . 2001. Inherited sterility in Cactoblastis cactorum (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). Florida Entomol 84:537–542. Google Scholar

6.

L. C. Haines 1981. Changes in colour of a secretion in the reproductive tract of adult males of Spodoptera littoralis (Boisduval) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) with age and mated status. Bull. Entomol. Res 71:591–598. Google Scholar

7.

T. J. Henneberry and T. E. Clayton . 1984. Time of emergence, mating, sperm movement, and transfer of ejaculatory duct secretory fluid by Heliothis virescens (F.) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) under reversed light-dark cycle laboratory conditions. Ann. Entomol. Soc. America 77:301–305. Google Scholar

8.

S. D. Hight, J. E. Carpenter, S. Bloem, and K. A. Bloem . 2005. Developing a sterile insect release program for Cactoblastis cactorum (Berg) (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae): Effective overflooding ratios and release-recapture field studies. Environ. Entomol 34:851–856. Google Scholar

9.

D. L. Mahr 2001. Cactoblastis cactorum in North America. A workshop of assessment and planning. Florida Entomol 84:465–473. Google Scholar

10.

A. J. Musgrave 1937. The histology of the male and female reproductive organs of Ephestia kühniella Zeller (Lepidoptera). I. The young imagines. Proc. Zool. Soc London (B) 107:337–364. Google Scholar

11.

I. Outram 1970. Morphology and histology of the reproductive system of male spruce budworm, Choristoneura fumiferana. Canadian Entomol 102:404–414. Google Scholar

12.

I. Outram 1971. Morphology and histology of the reproductive system of female spruce budworm, Choristoneura fumiferana (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). Canadian Entomol 103:32–43. Google Scholar

13.

F. I. Proshold 1991. Mating status of tobacco budworm (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) males captured in pheromone traps compared with males and females collected at night by hand. J. Econ. Entomol 84:1492–1498. Google Scholar

14.

J. W. Snow and T. C. Carlysle . 1967. A characteristic indicating the mating status of male fall armyworm moths. Ann. Entomol. Soc. America 60:1071–1074. Google Scholar

15.

StatSoft, Inc. 2004. STATISTICA. (data analysis software system), version 7.  www.statsoft.comGoogle Scholar

Appendices

Fig. 1.

Posterior primary simplex of mated (top) and unmated (bottom) male Cactoblastis cactorum. A constriction (white arrow) marks the posterior end of the primary simplex and the anterior end of the cuticular simplex, here partly obscured by fat body and genital structures, including claspers. Scale = 1.0 mm

i0015-4040-90-1-278-f01.jpg

Fig. 2.

Contents of posterior primary simplex of mated (top) and unmated (bottom) male Cactoblastis cactorum. Scale = 10 μm

i0015-4040-90-1-278-f02.gif
Orville G. Marti and James E. Carpenter "A CHARACTER DEMONSTRATING THE OCCURRENCE OF MATING IN MALE CACTOBLASTIS CACTORUM (LEPIDOPTERA: PYRALIDAE)," Florida Entomologist 90(1), 278-281, (1 March 2007). https://doi.org/10.1653/0015-4040(2007)90[278:ACDTOO]2.0.CO;2
Published: 1 March 2007
Back to Top